The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) encourages parents to resolve disputes without going to court and, where possible, to have cooperative and shared parenting after separation.
Family law proceedings for all children, whether their parents are married or not, are covered by the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) [Part VII] and all references in this section are to this Act unless stated otherwise.
Under the Act each parent has parental responsibility for their children until they attain the age of 18 years (or earlier if the child marries). This responsibility is not diminished by any orders made in respect of the parenting of the child except to the extent specifically provided in the order.
The Commonwealth Attorney General's Department have a comprehensive guide titled Parenting Orders- What You Need to Know
The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia has put together a video titled How the court process works for parenting cases
Most separating parents are able to decide between themselves where the children will live and other parenting issues without taking the matter to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. Solutions reached in this way usually suit everybody better than a decision imposed by the Court. Court battles over children are often very bitter, drawn out and expensive.
Drawn out and acrimonious proceedings resulting in a court decision that appears to leave one side the winner and the other the loser may increase the bitterness between the parties. This can be avoided if the parents are able to agree, without the intervention of the Court, about the most satisfactory living and other arrangements for the children.
In any event, everyone applying to the Court for a parenting order must attend, or attempt to participate in, family dispute resolution — unless their situation fits one of the exceptions set out in subsection 60I(9) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Section 60I certificate
An application to the Court for a parenting order must include a certificate issued by a family dispute resolution practitioner [s 60I(7)]. The certificate will say one or other of the following:
A certificate from a family dispute resolution practitioner is not required where [s 60I(9)]:
Once proceedings have begun, the Court must still look at making an order that the persons involved go to family dispute resolution even if a person can prove one of the above exceptions applies to them.
Dispute resolution is about people coming together to talk about their differences and trying to reach agreement. This can happen with all the people involved talking in the same room, or it may be able to happen separately if people do not wish to see each other. Where children are involved, the aim of family dispute resolution is to reach an agreement about what is in the best interests of the children.
Options for family dispute resolution
For a list of family dispute resolution services in South Australia, see the Family Dispute Resolution Provider Register maintained by the Commonwealth Attorney-General's Department. Agreements reached may then be made into parenting plans or consent orders.
The Legal Services Commission provides legally assisted family dispute resolution, called conferencing, through its Family Dispute Resolution Unit. To use this service at least one party must be eligible for legal aid. Usually, both parents and their lawyers are present. Agreements reached may then be made into consent orders. To find out more, see our Family Law Conferencing pamphlet.
If you are not eligible for legal aid, you can go to a Family Relationship Centre or other family dispute resolution provider as outlined above.
National Legal Aid has developed an online service that helps separating couples reach agreement themselves about parenting and property issues. This low-cost service allows parties to reach and record agreements on a trusted secure online platform. For more information see amica – Assistance reaching and recording agreements, or visit the amica website (opens new window).
Who can provide a Family Dispute Resolution certificate?
Only registered Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners can provide certificates establishing whether or not dispute resolution has been attempted. Whilst there are many services that can provide family dispute resolution such as mediation and counselling, not all are registered practitioners. The main agencies which provide these services such as the Family Relationships Centres, Relationships Australia, Anglicare and Centacare are registered. See the online Family Dispute Resolution Provider Register.
While an invitation to negotiate through amica may result in a formal resolution, if it does not work out, participation through amica does not qualify as family dispute resolution for the purposes of obtaining a s 60I certificate.
What happens if parents agree about the children?
Where an agreement has been reached there is no need for the Court to ratify the decision and no formal orders are required. Agreements can be verbal, but parents are encouraged to prepare parenting plans to help avoid disputes. Parenting plans are written agreements between parents regarding arrangements for a child. Family dispute resolution services or amica can assist with preparing parenting plans.
Is family dispute resolution right for every situation?
Family dispute resolution may not be right for every situation. Examples of instances in which family dispute resolution is not recommended are:
Is family dispute resolution confidential?
What is said during family dispute resolution sessions is normally confidential and not admissible in court. However, a family dispute resolution practitioner may (but does not have to) give information to the Court if they believe that to do so:
Are parenting plans legally binding?
Without being filed in the Court as consent orders, parenting plans have no legal force. However, if the parties are later before the Court, the Court will consider the terms of the latest parenting plan. After reaching an agreement some people prefer to apply to the Court for a binding order. This can be done by preparing a consent order. Consent orders enable the parenting plan to become legally binding. The Court has a Application for Consent Order Kit but parties should get independent legal advice first.
Can a party still apply to the Court for orders after agreeing to a parenting plan?
Yes, a party can still make an application to the Court for parenting orders. However, the first stage of the process for all applicants will still involve attending family dispute resolution and/or obtaining a section 60I certificate, as outlined above. Although it was not legally binding, the Court will also consider the terms of the latest parenting plan.
What if the parties want to change orders?
If both parents agree on how orders should be changed, then they can:
Where only one parent seeks a variation, an application must be made to the Court with evidence to justify the variation. Usually there needs to be a substantial change in circumstances, and the first stage of the process will still involve attending family dispute resolution and/or obtaining a section 60I certificate as outlined above.
Regardless of their relationship status (i.e. married, never married, separated or divorced) all parents have legal responsibility for their children aged under 18, unless a family law court orders otherwise. What follows is a brief description of the types of orders that a Family Law Court can make with regard to children. All orders relating to children are known as 'parenting orders'. Parenting orders cover all aspects of care and welfare arrangements for children.
Applications for parenting orders can be made in the Federal Circuit and Family Court.
Terms such as “contact” and “residence” were used previously but the court now uses the terms “spends time with” and “lives with”.
If you have a court order that was made prior to the 1st July 2006 it will use the terms “residence” and “contact” and, unless you make a new agreement or the court makes a new order, these changes will not affect how your orders work.
Other specific types of parenting orders include:
Equal shared parental responsibility
When the court makes orders concerning children it must always consider the ‘best interests of the child’ [Family Law Act 1975 s 60CA]. The court is to presume that it is in the best interests of the child for the parents to have ‘equal shared parental responsibility’ [s 61DA]. This is a starting point for the court’s decision-making process and the court may determine, in the circumstances of an individual case, that shared parental responsibility is not appropriate.
Equal shared parental responsibility means that both parents share the right to make major long term decisions about the children of the relationship. If a parenting order says that both parents have shared parental responsibility, then the parents should talk to each other and make a genuine effort to make major long term decisions regarding the children themselves. Shared parental responsibility does not include day to day decisions about children such as what they wear.
Equal time
Equal shared parental responsibility is different to a child spending equal time with both parents. If the court presumes that the parents should have equal shared parental responsibility, it must look at whether spending equal time with each parent would be in the child’s best interests and also whether it is reasonably practical.
Substantial and significant time
Where equal time is not appropriate, the court must look at whether an order for ‘substantial and significant time’ is a practical alternative and in the best interests of the child. ‘Substantial and significant time’ means that the child spends time with a parent on weekends, holidays and weekdays so that the opportunity exists for time to be spent together in daily routine activities and also for events that are important to the child such as sporting events, birthdays and school activities.
In deciding whether an order should be made for either equal time or substantial and significant time, the court will consider the following:
The Commonwealth Attorney General's Department have a comprehensive guide Parenting Orders - what you need to know PDF
Most disputes concerning children are between the parents of the children. However, anyone who is concerned about the care, welfare and development of the child may apply [Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 69C(d)].
A wide range of other people may be so concerned about the children including:
Grandparents may find National Legal Aid's Fact Sheet Having a Grandchild in Your Care helpful.
For the court to have jurisdiction over a child, the child must be present in Australia, be an Australian citizen or ordinarily residing in Australia and so must one of the parties to the application. The court does not have the power to make any orders in relation to a child who is outside Australia, including situations of international child abduction.
Children can also apply for parenting orders (not including child maintenance orders) from the Federal Circuit and Family Law Court [Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 64B and 65C(b)].
A child who applies for parenting orders must have a case guardian (also known as a next friend), unless the court is satisfied that the child understands the nature and possible consequences of their case and is capable of conducting it. If a child applies without a case guardian, the court may appoint one [Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 r 3.13]. Any adult that has no interest adverse to that of the child and who can fairly and competently conduct the case for the child may consent to being a case guardian [r 3.14].
The court may order the case guardian to pay costs [r 3.13] or that costs of a case guardian be paid by another party to the proceedings or from the income or property, if any, of the child [r 3.18].
Before any action is taken in the Federal Circuit and Family Court, certain steps must usually be taken (called pre-action procedures), unless the matter is exempt or potentially exempt from this requirement. These steps are designed to ensure that reasonable attempts are made to resolve the matter without going to court.
Family dispute resolution required for all parenting order applications
Prior to commencing an application for parenting orders, it is necessary for both parties to attempt to resolve their dispute by family dispute resolution unless an exception applies [Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 60I(8)]. Exceptions apply in cases where the application is an urgent one (e.g. recovery of a child), where allegations of child abuse or family violence have been made, in relation to some contravention applications and where one or more parties is unable to participate effectively (because of incapacity or physical remoteness or some other reason) [s 60I(9)]. A certificate from a family dispute resolution practitioner or an affidavit as to exception must be filed with the application for parenting orders [r 4.02].
Pre-action procedures
There are also pre-action procedures set out in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) sch 1. These need not be complied with where there is a risk of family violence, urgency, undue prejudice or there has been a previous application in the same cause of action in the last 12 months [r 4.01(3)].
At the time of filing an application to start a proceeding, each party must file a Genuine Steps Certificate outlining:
The pre-action procedures are set out in schedule 1 to the rules. They require the following (if it is safe to do so):
It is expected that a party will not start a proceeding by filing an application unless the proposed respondent does not respond to a notice of intention to start a proceeding, or if no agreement can be reached after a reasonable attempt to settle the matter by the required correspondence.
Schedule 1 also sets out that both parties must comply, as far as practicable, with the duty of disclosure set out in rule 6.01. This means that each party will disclose to the other all information that is relevant to the issues in dispute in a timely manner. Copies of relevant documents such as medical reports and school reports should be exchanged. Sub rule 6.05(2) lists relevant documents that must be disclosed in parenting proceedings.
Anyone who does not comply with these requirements (unless exempt under sub rule 4.01(2)) risks serious consequences, including costs penalties. Where there is unreasonable non-compliance, the court may order the non-complying party to pay all or part of the costs of the other party or parties in the case. The court may also take compliance or non-compliance into account when making orders about case management and may stay a proceedings pending compliance.
The court expects parties to take a sensible and responsible approach to pre-action procedures and parties must not use the pre-action procedure for an improper purpose (for example, to harass the other party or to cause unnecessary cost or delay). Parties must not raise in their correspondence irrelevant issues or issues that might cause the other party to adopt an entrenched, polarised or hostile position [see schedule 1 to the Rules].
For more information, see the Court's brochure Before you file - pre-action procedure for parenting cases.
Applications for the Federal Circuit and Family Court are filed in the Federal Circuit and Family Court Registry (all applications (including consent orders) can only be filed in Division 2). An original and two copies of the application must be filed.
The court keeps the original application and returns to the applicant the other stamped copies, on which the hearing date has been noted. A stamped copy of the application must be served on the respondent (the person against whom the proceedings are being taken). If the application is to be contested the respondent must prepare a document called a Response.
Forms are available from the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia website.
For up-to-date information on fees in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, and possible reduction in fees - see their website which contains details of current fees.
Chapter 12 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) describes the costs solicitors may charge for work done in family law proceedings. Under rule 12.17, costs may be charged in accordance with a costs agreement or, if there is no costs agreement, in accordance with the Itemised Scale of Costs [see Sch 3].
When making a costs agreement with a client, a lawyer must advise the client to obtain independent legal advice about the costs agreement. If the client agrees to enter into a costs agreement, the costs to be charged must be set out in a written agreement signed by the client and the solicitor.
Time frames for hearings may vary depending on the nature of the application, how many matters the court already has listed, and whether the application was lodged during a busy period of year i.e. the Christmas and New Year period. Unless the matter is urgent, it is generally first heard approximately six weeks after the application was filed. The parties can represent themselves, and anyone over the age of 18 years can attend.
In certain emergency situations - for example, when one parent fails to return the child to the other parent in accordance with a court order, parenting plan or the child’s long term living arrangements - an application for an urgent hearing can be made.
Limited police involvement
In these cases it should be noted that, even if the other party is breaching existing court orders, the police will not get involved unless there is another court order authorising them to do so. If you are concerned about a child’s welfare you can ask the police to check on the child, but usually they cannot do more than that without the court specifically authorising them to. You therefore need to apply for an urgent hearing.
Urgency
The application must be filed with the court and served on the other party immediately, and the matter is heard as soon as possible.
Applications forms and what orders to ask for
If there are no current court proceedings, you need to use anInitiating application form. All family law applications go to the Federal Circuit and Family Court. You will have to ask for final orders (for example, that the child lives with you) as well as interim orders. The interim orders you should ask for include an order that the application be heard urgently. Other orders you should seek could include orders that the other person return the child immediately; that the parties be restrained from changing the child’s place of residence and that the child’s name be added to the Family Law Watch List. You will need to file an Affidavit with your application, in which you explain why the matter is urgent and why you are asking for those orders.
If there is already a case going through court, the form to use is Application in a Proceeding, together with an Affidavit.
Ex parte hearings
In cases of extreme urgency - for example, where it is feared that a child may be taken out of the country – you can ask the court to make an order before you have served the application on the other party. This means that the other party is not given notice of the hearing, so the hearing is held ex parte (in the absence of the other party). The court usually wants to hear from both parties, so ex parte orders are rarely made.
Passports and police warrants
As with any application, the court can order the surrender of passports (including the child's), and may issue a warrant to authorise the police to stop and search any vehicle, vessel or aircraft, or enter and search any premises, in order to take possession of a child.
To finalise a matter
Ordinarily, a matter takes about 18 months to progress from application to trial.
If the court is unable to hear the matter at the time it is listed for trial it may be put off for a further two or three months.
There is however provision for a matter to be listed for trial urgently in certain circumstances. The procedure is to write to the Judges Listing Committee requesting an urgent listing and setting out convincing reasons. Of course there is often a wide gap between the court's perception of urgency and that of the parents. If the Committee is satisfied that the case is urgent, they will give the matter an early pre hearing conference date leading to a trial in a much abbreviated time.
In general, an urgent trial listing should not be expected where the issue of urgency can be adequately addressed by interim orders addressing the situation until trial.
The Court applies Part VII of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), which relates to children.
Section 60B of the Act sets out the main aim and principles of Part VII.
The main aim of the part is to ensure the best interests of children are met by:
The principles underlying that main aim are:
Under s 60CA of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) the Court’s paramount consideration in making any parenting orders must be the best interests of the child.
How does the Court work out what's in the best interests of the child?
When determining what's in the best interests of the child the Court must consider a set of primary considerations and a set of additional considerations [s 60CC].
Primary considerations
In applying these two primary considerations the Court must give greater wight to protecting the child from physical and psychological harm [Family Law Act 1975 s 60CC (2A)].
Additional considerations
Harm and Unacceptable Risk
In considering what parenting orders to make, the Court is required to determine both:
In the case of Isles & Nelissen [2022] FedCFamC1A 97, the Court on appeal clarified that the test for ‘unacceptable risk’ is not proof on the balance of probabilities but rather the “assessment of risk is an evidence-based conclusion and is not discretionary… The finding about whether an unacceptable risk exists, based on known facts and circumstances, is either open on the evidence or it is not” [paragraph 85]. The Court stated [paragraph 7]:
“Once it is accepted courts should (and do) react to dangers in the form of risks of harm which may merely be possibilities, it is an oxymoron to expect such possibilities to then be forensically proven on the balance of probabilities according to the civil standard of proof. By definition, possibilities are not, and could never be, probabilities. Risks of harm are not susceptible to scientific demonstration or proof (CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 at [151]), but are instead postulated from known historical facts and present circumstances.”
On the question of what evidence is, or should be, admissible on this issue, the Court stated [paragraph 105]:
“Any evidence which is relevant to and influential in that predictive inquiry is admissible and should be taken into account (presuming it survives any other applicable rules of evidence), regardless of whether it meets the definition of and the threshold requirements for admissibility under the tendency rule.”
Ultimately, the Court must make orders that are in the best interests of the children and an evidence-based finding of unacceptable risk is one of the many considerations in the exercise of this discretionary power [paragraph 85].
Supervised Contact
Supervised Contact means that the Court wants a third person present when a parent spends time with their child. The Court may decide it is appropriate that a parent spend supervised time with their child because:
Supervised contact may be ordered by the Court at the end of court proceedings (in a Final Order) or at any point during proceedings (in an Interim Order).
Supervised contact can be done privately through another family member or a friend, through a privately engaged supervisor or through a Family Contact Service. A Family Contact Service is a neutral place where a parent and child can spend time together in a safe environment.
There are a number of Family Contact Service providers in South Australia, depending on where the parties are located. Some Family Contact Service providers include:
If you have been asked to supervise contact between a child and a parent, more information is available in our ‘Should I Supervise Contact?’ Factsheet.
Parties to a case have a duty to make full and frank disclosure of all information relevant to the issues in dispute in a timely manner. This duty starts at the pre-action procedure stage before the case commences and continues until the case is finalised.
In South Australia, a Notice of Child Abuse, Family Violence or Risk document must be filed with any initiating application, response, or application for consent orders for parenting matters- in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. This document deals with possible child abuse or neglect, family violence or other risks to a child.
In attempting to resolve a parenting dispute, parties should also, as soon as practicable, exchange copies of documents in their possession relevant to an issue in dispute (e.g. medical reports, school reports, letters, drawings, photographs).
Any documents that have been disclosed can only be used for the purpose of resolving the dispute for which they were disclosed.
In making any decision about a child the Court will take into account any views expressed by the child, but the weight the Court will give to the child's views will depend on any factors the Court thinks is relevant, such as the child's maturity and level of understanding.
There is no rule that says that children of a particular age can make independent decisions about where they may live. There are a number of reasons for this, including the fact that age does not necessarily always match maturity. It is also important to bear in mind that children often express to each parent a wish to live with them, and that they may do so out of concern to maintain close contact with that parent and not to lose them from their lives, rather than with an adult understanding of the consequences.
However, despite this a number of practical issues will invariably arise, particularly with children aged 16 and over. For example, a child of 17 years is unlikely to be able to be made to follow a parenting order about where they should live. In these circumstances, resorting to the Court to enforce an existing order may be a fruitless task.
It should be noted that children do not give evidence to the Court, nor will the Judge ordinarily see or speak to the children. Rather, the children's wishes are ascertained via a child expert providing a family assessment, or through the appointment of an Independent Children's Lawyer.
The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia has put together a video titled How the voice of the child is heard?
The court may order (of its own motion, or when a child or any other person or organisation concerned with the child's welfare applies) that the child's interests be independently represented [Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 68L] and ask the Legal Services Commission to arrange the representation.
In the case of Re K (1994) FLC 92-461 the Full Court of the Family Court laid down an extensive list of guidelines for cases in which an independent children’s lawyer should be appointed. These stipulate that a lawyer may be appointed where:
It is well established that the independent children’s lawyer does not act on instructions from the child and in this sense, is not the child's lawyer. Rather, they gather evidence to be presented to the court to assist it in determining where the child's best interests may lie. The independent children’s lawyer may seek any orders he or she considers to be in the best interests of the child, and may choose to support or oppose the making of orders proposed by one or other parent. Naturally, this can give rise to dissatisfaction on the part of the other parent and the child. In general it is not considered desirable for an independent children’s lawyer to interview children who have already been extensively interviewed for example by doctors, counsellors, social workers, psychologists etc.
At trial, parties do not normally give oral evidence in chief. Rather evidence is presented by way of affidavits which must be sworn, filed and served on the parties in advance of the trial. Directions for the dates for completing this task are usually given at the pre hearing conference and a compliance check ensues.
The affidavit sets out the evidence in chief of each witness proposed to be called by a party. In the case of the applicant or the respondent their affidavit should be comprehensive. The following matters should normally be addressed:
As with all affidavits, the deponents should normally stick to factual matters and should not contain speculations or expressions of opinion. They should also be free of hearsay reports, that is, evidence of things which are not within the parent's personal knowledge but have been gleaned from other sources such as second hand reports, the media, text books etc. As a parent is not considered by the court to be an expert in respect of their child, they should also not include any opinion material about the child's mental or physical health etc. It is sometimes difficult to draw the line, for example it is not unusual for affidavits to contain matter which could be considered comment, for example, on the other party's parenting skills, truthfulness etc.
Family assessments/counselling reports
Section 62G(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) provides for the court to direct a family consultant (court counsellor) to make a report. In making a report, the consultant will commonly interview each parent and the child individually, unless the child is of an age or maturity where this is inappropriate. Commonly also the consultant will observe interactions between the child and each party. Conversations with a consultant are not confidential. A report is prepared for the court and circulated to the parties. Although the consultant's opinion is not binding on the court and is just another opinion to be considered with the rest of the evidence, as it is an independent assessment of the situation it is generally persuasive.
Because of the high demand for reports, it is not practicable to obtain family assessment reports on an interim basis and they can normally only be ordered at a pre-hearing conference. For this reason, the parties sometimes arrange for a family assessment by a private practitioner in order to have an early report. Where the parties agree, they can do this without there being an independent children's lawyer appointed, but if agreement cannot be reached then an application for an independent children's lawyer to be appointed may result in the representative arranging a family assessment. Parents are normally required to contribute to the cost of the family assessment, and where they are unable to do so and are not legally aided, the report ordered by the court is an alternative.
Psychological reports
Although a party can apply to the Federal Circuit and Family Court that a child be referred for a report relating to psychiatric or psychological assessment, the unnecessary and unjustified exposure of a child to this kind of assessment is discouraged by the court. Referrals of children to psychiatrists or psychologists are limited to appropriate cases only, and the court can give any direction relating to the assessment that appears necessary having regard to the welfare of the child. Where a direction of the court has not been obtained, the court can refuse to admit the report in evidence unless all parties gave written consent to the referral. Where someone is threatening to obtain a psychological assessment it may be possible to obtain an injunction preventing it.
Expert witnesses
As part of the pre-action procedures, a party may require that information be sought from an expert witness. The rules about instructing and obtaining reports from an expert are in Chapter 7 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
In summary:
If separate experts’ reports are obtained, reports must be exchanged.
Cross-examination
Witnesses can be cross-examined as part of family law proceedings. Special protections exist for the personal cross-examination of a party in family law proceedings where there is an allegation of family violence and certain criteria are met, see the Family Violence and Cross-Examination of Parties Schemefactsheet.
Each individual case is assessed on its merits, and the fact that a parent seeking orders for a child to live with them where they are living in a homosexual relationship or in some alternative lifestyle is not directly relevant. What is relevant is the whole environment and the effect it will have on the child. Factors such as the personality and attitudes of the parties involved in the relationship or lifestyle, the strength of the relationship and the effect the relationship will have on the child will all be considered.
In a Family Court judgment in the case of Schmidt (1979) FLC 90-685, which considered the question of homosexual relationships, Chief Justice Evatt said:
'the ordinary observations of life would lead me to the view that one lesbian relationship could not necessarily be judged by another ... It could be a mistake to regard a person's sexual proclivities as the dominating trait of their personality as if it were something which occupied their sole attention and thoughts. The difficult task always confronting the Family Court is that of searching for the quality of a relationship and in assessing the personality and character of the persons concerned in access and custody matters.'
In determining what is in the best interests of the child the Family Law Court view homosexual relationships in the same light as heterosexual relationships.
Ordinarily the paternity of a child is acknowledged by both parties. The court will in these circumstances presume paternity [Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 69R]. A man is assumed to be a child's father if the man:
Declaration of paternity
Disputes sometimes arise where there is a request for child support or contact. If paternity is at issue in a matter before the Court, either parent may ask the court for a declaration of paternity. If satisfied that the relationship exists the court will make an order of paternity. A man wanting to deny a presumption of parentage must prove on the balance of probability that he is not the child's biological father.
DNA paternity testing
Whether contesting or asserting paternity, DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) tests are available which will establish paternity to the satisfaction of the court. DNA is made up of identifiable substances unique to each person, but which include some inherited from parents. DNA testing is accepted as the most definite proof of the physical relationship between humans. It is often referred to as a 'genetic fingerprint' and shows the links between individual body fluids in separate blood samples. The technique used to detect these links is known as DNA profiling. This technique is more effective than blood tests and blood typing because DNA can determine the identity of the parent to within 99.5% as opposed to the process of elimination used in blood typing.
When will the court order DNA testing?
The court does not order DNA testing alone. This can only be done as an ancillary procedure to a parenting application. Thus, orders for DNA testing cannot be made simply to satisfy the curiosity of a parent. They will only be ordered where they are needed in order to determine whether any parenting application is in the best interests of the child concerned.
Costs
Tests are done privately for a fee which varies between providers. Court orders for paternity tests are paid by the person who wants the results as evidence in their case or if on legal aid, the Legal Services Commission may pay. The unsuccessful party will normally be ordered to pay costs. If therefore there is no real doubt about paternity, applicants should be warned against baseless or vexatious applications, as they will be likely to pay the costs.
Location and recovery orders are provided for by sections 67J and 67Q of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and cover the situation where a person is prevented from having contact with their children because the other parent has taken the children without disclosing their whereabouts. In appropriate circumstances the court can order that any body which may have knowledge of the other parent's whereabouts to disclose this information to the court. Such orders are commonly made to obtain information from Centrelink, the ATO, banks etc.
Parenting orders required for location or recovery order
To apply for a location or recovery order, a person must also apply for a parenting order or have an existing order. If a person has only a parenting plan or verbal agreement about who the children live with and spend time with, he or she will need to apply for parenting orders at the same time as applying for the location order.
Protection for family violence victims
Section 67P provides that any information divulged to the court under a location order must not be provided to the person who applies for the order. Instead, the information is disclosed to other persons such as a lawyer, court official, process server or police officer. This is to protect a victim of family violence from being at risk from a former partner. In the case of an unrepresented party, if a location order is granted, the usual procedure would be for the court to either to supply the information to a marshal who can arrange for the other party to be served, or else to appoint a child representative to contact the other party.
Police powers under recovery orders
The court may order the return of the child by way of a recovery order which will be carried out by the Federal police [Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 67R]. As an ancillary power, the police may stop and search any vehicle, vessel or aircraft on which the child is suspected to be. In practice, Federal police may not have the resources at any given time to retrieve a child and this can lead to some delays or to the involvement of State police at the request of Federal police.
Also it should be noted that the police will not normally execute a recovery order unless the parent entitled to the benefit of the order is with them at or near the place where the child is to be recovered. If therefore the child has been taken interstate, the parent seeking the recovery of the child will have to travel interstate at their own expense before the order can be executed. If a parent has no resources from which to make the journey, it may be possible to seek emergency financial assistance from the Department for Child Protection.
Children taken overseas
The Hague Convention provides for the return of children from one member country to which they have been taken, to the member country of their origin. These applications are dealt with by the Australian Central Authority. For more information about making an application for the return of an abducted child to Australia, call the Australian Central Authority on 1800 100 480 or visit the Commonwealth Attorney-General's Department webpage on International parental child abduction, which includes a Guide for applicants - Applying for the return of a child under the Hague Convention. Assistance to complete applications may be available from the International Social Service, call 1300 657 843.
It is not at all uncommon for one (or both parents) to wish to relocate after a separation. If the relocation will not affect existing or proposed arrangements for children, it is less problematic. When it will affect those arrangements, these cases can be difficult to resolve with fairness to all parties involved.
If considering relocation legal advice is essential. If one parent relocates without the other parent’s consent, the other parent (or person concerned with the care, welfare and development of the child) may apply to the Court for an order that the child be returned.
The Court has the power to order a child’s return if it determines that to be in the child’s best interests, and will often do so pending its determination. It is therefore advisable to obtain the other parent's consent and/or a court order permitting the relocation first.
Remember that an attempt at family dispute resolution is usually necessary before applying for parenting orders, including orders relating to relocation, see What needs to be done before applying?
Whilst the Family Law Court has ruled that relocation cases are not a separate type of case, in determining the best interests of a child, the following is a list of factors that may be considered. This list is by no means exhaustive as each case will be assessed individually according to the circumstances involved.
If a parenting order states that a child is to live with one parent and that parent dies, and the parenting order does not say what is to happen in the event of that parent's death, then the surviving parent cannot just require the child to live with him or her [see Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 65K]. A parent can appoint someone else to take over as guardian of the child in the event of their death, but this is not in any way binding either, and will merely be taken as an expression of the deceased parent’s wishes.
In the event of a dispute, the surviving parent (or another person such as a relative or friend of the deceased parent who is acting as guardian) may make an application to the Family Law Court to determine this and any other issues. The application would be decided in the same way as any other, on the basis of all of the circumstances at the time, and with the child's best interests as the paramount consideration.
From 6 June 2022, the Family Law Court has established the Critical Incident List to fast-track applications by a non-parent carer where there is no parent available to care for the children as a result of the death, critical injury or incarceration (relating to or resulting from a family violence incident) of the parents. For more information, see the Family Law Practice Direction: Critical Incident List.
All orders cease when the child turns 18 years, marries, enters into a de facto relationship or is adopted by another person [Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 65H(2) and 65J(2)].
Where the child is adopted by a step parent, parenting orders are not altered unless the Family Law Court approved the adoption, see FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS - Adoption.
An order can be varied at any time, but unless there has been a significant change in the circumstances of either of the parents or the child, the court is generally reluctant to change existing orders except by consent of the parties.
Parenting orders create legal obligations and are legally enforceable by the parties. The Court expects that all parties will follow parenting orders.
The parties are usually given a copy of the Court’s information sheet, Parenting orders – obligations, consequences and who can help.
If one party fails to follow a parenting order (that has not been changed by a subsequent parenting plan [Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 70 NBB]), the other party may file either:
[see Federal Circuit and Family Court (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) r 11.64].
There is no fee to lodge either of these applications, but cost orders can be made against an applicant where a contravention, for example, is not established.
It is important to obtain legal advice before making any application.
Which type of application
If the party seeking to enforce the parenting order does not want the other party to be punished for failing to follow it and simply wants make-up time with the child or wants to enforce handover, they may file an enforcement application rather than a contravention application.
If the party seeking to enforce the parenting order also wants the other party punished for failing to follow the orders, then a contravention application may be more appropriate.
If one party removes a child and refuses to return a child, an application for a location and recovery order may be more appropriate, see ‘What if one parent refuses to return the children?’.
See further information about enforcement and contraventions on the Court’s website:
Children: Compliance and enforcement
Both enforcement and contravention matters may be referred to family dispute resolution, counselling, or specified parenting programs [Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 13C].
Enforcement Applications
An Application - Enforcement needs to be filed and served together with a prescribed brochure and an affidavit with a copy of the orders to be enforced. Further documents relating to pre-action procedures may also be required.
The Registry Manager must fix a date for hearing that is as near as practicable to 14 days after the day of filing [Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) r 11.66].
Contravention Applications
Before filing
It may not be necessary to obtain a section 60I certificate from a family dispute resolution practitioner before filing a contravention application where an exception applies, such as risk of child abuse or family violence, or urgency. There is a further exception where:
Burden of proof
The party bringing the application will need to prove the contravention. An order is contravened where the party:
Standard of proof
For the purposes of serious penalties (such as a bond, a fine, community service or imprisonment), the applicant will need to prove the contravention beyond reasonable doubt [s 70NAF(3)]. This is the same standard of proof as in criminal matters.
For less serious penalties, the contravention need only be proved on the balance of probabilities, that is, that the contravention is more likely than not to be true.
Reasonable excuse
The other party may admit the contravention but defend it on the basis that they had a “reasonable excuse”.
A party may have a reasonable excuse for contravening an order if [s 70NAE]:
or
There may be other circumstances where the Court will be satisfied that a party had a reasonable excuse to contravene a parenting order.
The party will need to prove they had the reasonable excuse on the balance of probabilities [s 70NAF(1)]. This means that the excuse is more likely than not to be true.
Possible orders the Court can make
Where there is no contravention
If the Court finds that there was not any contravention, the Court may make an order that the applicant pay the other party’s legal costs [s 70NCB]. The Court may also change the existing parenting orders [s 70NBA].
Where there is contravention, but also a reasonable excuse
If the Court finds that there was a reasonable excuse for the contravention, but the contravention resulted in the applicant losing time with the child, the Court must consider making an order compensating the applicant for time lost with make-up time [s 70NDB].
If no order is made compensating the applicant for lost time the Court may make an order that the applicant pay the other party’s legal costs [s 70NDC]. The Court may also change the existing parenting orders [s 70NBA].
Where there is a contravention without reasonable excuse
If the Court finds that there was no reasonable excuse for the contravention, the way it is dealt with depends on its seriousness.
It will be less serious if the Court has not already previously made orders or adjourned a matter in relation to contravention by the party. However, if the contravention shows a serious disregard for the party’s obligations under the parenting order, the Court may treat it more seriously anyway.
Less serious contraventions may be dealt with by way of orders for [s 70NEB]:
More serious contraventions may be dealt with by way of orders for [s 70NFB]:
Changing court orders
Whether or not a contravention is proved or there was reasonable excuse, the Court has the power to change existing parenting orders as part of contravention proceedings [s 70NBA]. However, there usually needs to be a significant change in the circumstances before a final order is changed.
Filing and listing of contravention applications
The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia has a dedicated electronic National Contravention List. Contravention applications will be given their first court date before a Contravention Registrar within 14 days of filing. A Contravention Application needs to be filed and served together with additional documents such as an affidavit, a copy of the orders alleged to be contravened, and section 60I certificate or affidavit relating to exemption from family dispute resolution. A Genuine Steps Certificate, may also be required, in accordance with pre-action procedures, see What needs to be done before applying?
For more information, see also the Court’s National Contravention List Practice Direction
Chapter 12 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) set out the process for disputing costs.
Party to party costs
From the 1 July 2008 only disputes about costs between parties (i.e. party to party costs) can be adjudicated by the Family Law Court. Where a party wishes to dispute the costs awarded to or against them a Notice Disputing Itemised Costs Account must be served on the other party within 28 days of being served with the account.
The parties to the dispute must make a reasonable and genuine attempt to resolve the dispute [r 12.37]. If the dispute cannot be resolved, either party can take it to court by filing the itemised costs account and a Notice Disputing Itemised Costs Account with the court no later than 42 days after the Notice Disputing Itemised Costs Account was served.
Lawyer/client costs
Disputes between lawyers and clients regarding costs are no longer dealt with by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. Where a person has a dispute with their lawyer regarding costs they must make an application to either the Legal Profession Conduct Commission (see Complaints about overcharging) or to the Supreme Court of South Australia for the resolution of the dispute (see Adjudication of legal costs).